Sunday, 8 November 2009
Sit Here and Rest Awhile
Saturday, 31 October 2009
Busker Jack
Sunday, 11 October 2009
Ride to the Wall
Eyes fixed on the wall in front of him.
He stopped, then bent forward and laid a wreath of red poppies on the ground in front of him.
Taking a few steps backwards he bowed his head in a moment of silence - reflection - thought, before turning and walking away.
After him came many more, all bikers, all sharing a passion for motorcycles, coming from many parts of the United Kingdom, from towns in Wales and Scotland. Some were ex-servicemen, many had never served in the military, but they had all come together for this gathering.
The event - 'Ride to the Wall' - Close to ten thousand bikers from all over the country descended on Drayton Manor Theme Park in Staffordshire for the start of 'Ride to the Wall 2009'. An event that even though it's only in it's second year is rising in recognition and support all the time.
The event sees the bikers, from many different 'chapters' and clubs, ride the eleven or so miles from the theme park to the National Memorial Arboretum in a long procession of motorbikes.
The National Arboretum is located in the heart of the country within the National Forest near Lichfield.
It is the home of the Armed Forces Memorial, a striking and emotive structure that gives recognition and thanks for those who have died whilst on duty or as a result of terrorist action since the Second World War and acknowledges the enduring sacrifice of those who mourn their loss.
'Ride to the Wall' is the brainchild of Martin Dickinson and aims to remember those that died during these times and remember those that can, "No longer ride beside us."
Exact numbers attending this years event and the amount of funds raised is still being worked out, but if this year was a sign of the increasing popularity of this amazing and moving show of support and recognition, then next years event is something well worth attending - whether you ride a bike or not.
For further information see....
Ride to the Wall - http://www.rttw.org
The National Memorial Arboretum - http://www.thenma.org.uk
Sunday, 4 October 2009
Teach a man to fish...
Working as a freelance fly fishing instructor for a Hampshire company called 'Fishing Breaks', founded and owned by Simon Cooper, who is also a very experienced fly fisherman, Duncan teaches the art of fly fishing.
I spent Saturday at Fishing Breaks in Hampshire and with Duncan as he met up with four guys who wanted to give it a go...
'Teach a man to fish'.
Sunday, 27 September 2009
London - Covent Garden
The hustle and bustle of a big city especially in an area such as Covent Garden offers much for the photographer, even in the current climate where photographers are treated, at times, with suspicion, if you use the right approach you can still work freely and hopefully get some good shots.
My approach in this kind of environment is to be very upfront when I photograph and to try and act naturally, with confidence and present the appearance of being someone who is exactly where they are supposed to be! If you act suspiciously or without confidence then people will pick up on this, act naturally and you won't draw unwanted attention.
A lot of it is trial and error, trying to find the 'flow' or the 'feel' of a place and fitting into that flow. In a way it's easy in this kind of environment because there are many street entertainers, loads of tourists, many of whom are taking photos, and various weird and wonderful characters so one more random photographer taking pictures kind of gets lost in all the confusion.
Wednesday, 23 September 2009
Concert shooting
Fortunately and something that is not common, especially at larger gigs, was that I had pretty much unrestricted access and movement in the pit in front of the stage was easy enough with only around six other photographers in there, so not too crowded and the first three songs rule didn't apply.
The trickiest part was to get the exposure nailed - Ambient dropping as night fell, white, blue, orange, red, green spotlights everywhere, smoke machine chugging away, lots of unpredictable movement...you get the idea. Tricky but good to get in there and get some shots nailed.
Kit wise I was using a D3 with an 85mm 1.4 and my D2x was on a wide lens, just for the record, the D3 was shooting at 3200 ISO at f2 and gave me a shutter of an 8000th and as far as image noise is concerned the pictures were awesome, visible yes, but nowhere near as bad as the D2x for low light, high ISO noise.
So if you get the opportunity to shoot some live music then get on it and push yourself and your photography.
Sunday, 6 September 2009
You decide...
JULIE JACOBSON is a writer and photographer with the news agency Associated Press, she was embedded with US troops from Golf Company, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marines and took the images and wrote the journal linked below.
Recently there has been discussion about whether it was the right decision to take, transmit and subsequently release the image of the mortally injured Lance Corporal Joshua Bernard following a hit from an RPG during a patrol. From this, questions about the right and wrong, questions on the morality and responsibility of photographers', journalists and news organisations are raised.
Take a look at the links below and the extract from Julie's journal and see what do you think?
Audio Slideshow.....
http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/_international/afghan_marine/
Statement from the Associated Press on their reasons for the release of the image...
http://www.ap.org/pages/about/pressreleases/pr_090409a.html
The following is an extract from the online journal of JULIE JACOBSON written whilst embedded with the US troops...
Wednesday Aug. 19, 2009
The last few slow days have allowed me to reflect some on the events of Friday, the 14th. I did not ever formally meet Bernard. There are some 50 men in a platoon, and every day we were going out with different squads, so I have not really gotten to know the guys too well. ...
I shot images that day well aware that those images could very possibly never see the light of day. In fact I was sure of it. But I still found myself recording them. To ignore a moment like that simply because of a phrase in section 8, paragraph 1 of some 10-page form would have been wrong. I was recording his impending death, just as I had recorded his life moments before walking the point in the bazaar. Death is a part of life and most certainly a part of war. Isn't that why we're here? To document for now and for history the events of this war? We'd shot everything else thus far and even after, from feature images of a Marine talking on a SAT phone to his girlfriend, all the way to happy meetings between Marines and civilians. So shooting the image was not a question.
To publish or not is the question. The image is not the most technically sound, but his face is visible as are his wounds. Many factors come into play. There's the form we signed agreeing to how and what we would cover while embedded. It says we can photograph casualties from a respectable distance and in such a way that the person is not identifiable. Then you think about the relatives and friends of Bernard. Would you, as a parent, want that image posted for all the world to see? Or even would you want to see how your son died? You'd probably want to remember him another way. Although, it was interesting to watch the Marines from his squad flip through the images from that day on my computer (they asked to see them). They did stop when they came to that moment. But none of them complained or grew angry about it. They understood that it was what it was. They understand, despite that he was their friend, it was the reality of things.
Then there's the journalism side of things, which is what I am and why I'm here. We are allowed to report the name of the casualty as soon as next of kin has been notified. It is necessary and good to recognize those who die in times of war. But to me, a name on a piece of paper barely touches personalizing casualties. An image brings it home so much closer. An image personalizes that death and makes people see what it really means to have young men die in combat. It may be shocking to see, and while I'm not trying to force anything down anyone's throat, I think it is necessary for people to see the good, the bad and the ugly in order to reflect upon ourselves as human beings. It is necessary to be bothered from time to time. It is too easy to sit at Starbuck's far away across the sea and read about the casualty and then move on without much of another thought about it. It's not as easy to see an image of that casualty and NOT think about it. I never expect to change the world or stop war with one picture, but only hope that I make some people THINK beyond their comfort zones and hope that a few of them will be moved into some kind of action, be it joining a protest, or sending that care package they've put off for weeks, or writing that letter they keep meaning to write, or donating money to some worthy NGO, or just remembering to say I love you to someone at home. Something. I believe that is why I decided to send the photo in to the NY desk despite what the media rules of engagement said, to start some conversation about it and hope that it will move out there. It bothered me too much not to have at least some discussion about it. And with great respect and understanding to all the opposing arguments to publication, I feel that as journalists it is our social responsibility to record AND publish such images. We have no restrictions to shoot or publish casualties from opposition forces, or even civilian casualties. Are those people less human than American or other NATO soldiers?
I believe that it was the right decision to make the image available. I find the final paragraph in her journal above echoes many of my thoughts on this.
What would you have done?
AP website link...
http://www.ap.org/
Tuesday, 1 September 2009
I'm a photographer, not a terrorist
I'm a photographer, not a terrorist
http://photographernotaterrorist.org/
From their website...
Photography is under attack. Across the country it that seems anyone with a camera is being targeted as a potential terrorist, whether amateur or professional, whether landscape, architectural or street photographer.
Not only is it corrosive of press freedom but creation of the collective visual history of our country is extinguished by anti-terrorist legislation designed to protect the heritage it prevents us recording.
This campaign is for everyone who values visual imagery, not just photographers.
We must work together now to stop this before photography becomes a part of history rather than a way of recording it.